Monday , 17 June 2024

Financial Warfare: U.S. Would Be the Big Loser In Any Economic Confrontation With Russia – Here’s Why (2K Views)

Russia could initiate a much scarier financial attack on the U.S. than dumping its holdings of U.S. Treasurydollar-cash-money-hundred bonds were America to impose sanctions because of Russia’s actions in the Crimea.

So says George Washington ( in edited excerpts from his original article* entitled Forget Russia Dumping U.S. Treasuries … Here’s the REAL Economic Threat. (Hat tip to SeniorD)

 [The following is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor of and may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.]

Washington goes on to say in heavily paraphrased excerpts:

After Nixon took the U.S. off the gold standard, which had made the dollar the world’s reserve currency – America salvaged that role by adopting the petrodollar.   Specifically, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia agreed that all oil and gas would be priced in dollars, so the rest of the world had to use dollars for most transactions.

Jim Sinclair, however, is of the opinion that should Russia carry through and sign a planned bilateral trade deal with China, where China would buy huge quantities of Russian oil and gas, and if Russia accepts payment for oil and gas in any currency other than the dollar – whether it’s gold, the Euro, the Ruble, the Rupee, or anything else – then the U.S. petrodollar system will collapse. Why? Because one of the main pillars for U.S. power is the petrodollar, and the U.S. is desperate for the U.S. dollar to maintain its reserve currency status for as long as possible and, as Zero Hedge has noted previously, the average life expectancy for a fiat currency is less than 40 years.

 Source: JPMorgan

As the table shows, U.S. reserve status has already lasted as long as the Portugal and the Netherland reigns.  It won’t happen tomorrow, or next week but the end of the dollar’s rein is coming nonetheless, and China and many other countries are calling for a new reserve currency.

Remember, China is entering into more and more major deals with other countries to settle trades in Yuans, instead of dollars and, given that China has surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest importer of oil, Saudi Arabia is moving away from the U.S. … and towards China.

A switch to pricing petroleum in anything other than dollars exclusively – whether a single alternative currency, gold, or even a mix of currencies or commodities – would spell the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. For that reason, Sinclair – no fan of either Russia or Putin – urges American leaders to back away from an economic confrontation with Russia, arguing that the U.S. would be the loser.

 [Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.]


Related Articles:

1. Financial Warfare: What Would Russia’s Sale of US Treasury Holdings Mean for U.S.?

1 Comment

News events from the Crimean Peninsula have increased paranoia in the mainstream financial press and certain corners of the internet [that Russia, in response to any economic sanctions implemented by the West, might engage in some form of retaliatory financial warfare. Read More »

2. Will We See Financial Warfare Between U.S. & Russia?

1 Comment

There is little the United States can do militarily to change the outcome in Ukraine…but this does not mean the United States is helpless. No sooner had the Russian invasion become clear than the White House announced the possibility of economic sanctions against Russia….By implementing such sanctions, the United States has moved in the direction of a new kind of warfare — not kinetic war involving ships, planes and missiles — but financial war involving cash, stocks, bonds and derivatives. The policy question, and an important question for investors, is how far can this type of financial warfare go and how effective can it be? What will the impact of financial war be on markets in general and investors in particular? Read More »