Thursday , 13 June 2024

Predicting the Future Price of Gold Is All Relative – Here's Why


“Gold bugs” routinely solicit my prediction regarding the future gold price, assuming I must be an “educated” gold bug since my hedge fund happens to maintain large gold exposure… [but such an answer] depends on variables [such as] what time period? Next week? Month? Year? Ten years?  [and] compared to what? U.S. dollars? Euros? Real estate? Gummi bears! [Let me explain.] Words: 955

So says Jason Kaspar ( in an article* which Lorimer Wilson, editor of has further edited ([  ]), abridged (…) and reformatted below  for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. Please note that this paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement. Kaspar goes on to say:

Nearly everyone wants a prediction in U.S. dollars [see here (1) for the predictions of 129 analysts who maintain that gold is going at least as high as $2,500 with some forecasting a price of $15,000 per ozt. before the bubble bursts], which is highly humorous and paradoxical because the purported destruction of the dollar is a primary reason to own gold in the first place. What victory is there if the dollar value declines 50% and the gold price doubles? This is where I think investors need to make a distinction between “nominal” inflation and deflation and “real” inflation and deflation.  (Defining terms: Nominal inflation and deflation is an increase or decrease in the money supply, respectively. “Real” inflation or deflation is an increase or decrease in purchasing power in gold terms.)

Sign up for FREE weekly “Top 100 Stock Index, Asset Ratio & Economic

Nominally, I feel like my predictions are as good as the next guy’s, however, I believe deflation in “real” terms is one of the highest finance probability themes over the next three to five years [and, as such,] goods will become cheaper compared to gold despite what happens to the dollar.

The Housing Market

In dollars, home prices bottomed in 2009, bounced sideways for a while, and now they are resuming their decline. As a result of monumental government effort, housing has been more or less mired in a disinflationary environment. See the following chart.


Despite all of the government intervention and all of the Fed’s economic central planning, one can buy significantly more house per ounce of gold [now] than one could purchase in March of 2009.  This is the real reason to own gold. Gold is money. Its value is determined by its purchasing power – wholly and exclusively. If home prices fell another 25-50% in gold terms, it may make sense to sell gold and seek out attractive real estate to buy with it.

In “real” gold terms, the picture is far more gruesome. Below is the median home price as represented in ounces of gold. This figure is now rapidly approaching the 1981 low.

Median Home Price Compared to Gold, 1970 – 2011


Source: Chart Of The Day –

The Stock Market

The collapse in the stock market (as valued in gold) has not played out nearly to the extent of housing. In 1933 the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined to 1.9x the value of an ounce gold. The early thirties represented the worst deflationary depression in US history. Conversely, in 1981, the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined to 1.1x the value of an ounce of gold during a highly inflationary time period. In both environments, gold fell below a ratio of 2 to 1 compared to the DJIA. Today this ratio stands at 8.3x (down from 40x+ around 2001).

I see this trend continuing. In gold terms, the stock market has much further to decline – regardless which “nominal” direction it moves – and could easily represent an opportunity for 10x returns over the next several years if trading with the trend.

The graph below inverts this ratio, highlighting a decline in real prices as a rise in the ratio.


(I initially found this graph difficult to interpret. The designer of the graph took the current price of gold, divided it by the S&P 500, and then multiplied it by 100. [As such,] the latest point on the chart would be $1500 / 1335 * 100 = 112.36.)

The government has done everything possible to inflate the stock market…yet in real terms, deflation continues. Ultimately, the government has direct control over nominal inflation and deflation. Though I have felt the probabilities have favored nominal deflation for a long time, this has clearly been a bad trade. Those who have invested using this thesis have seen their losses splattered over Wall St. However, the same deflationary thesis using gold (instead of dollars) as your unit of measure has been a rewarding proposition over the past year, with most likely the bulk of gains still to come.


The government balance sheet is presently highly leveraged (and worsening by the minute). Deflation – in real terms – will likely continue. Maybe gold peaks to $6,000 per ozt. [see here (2) for the significance of the designation “ozt.”], or maybe plummets nominally to $1,000 [per ozt.]. I do not know, nor do I really care.

I own gold because of its relation to other assets having a high probability of deflating against it.

* (Jason is the Chief Investment Officer for Ark Fund Capital Management, focusing on investment and portfolio management.) 

Titles and Links to Articles Referenced Above:

  1. Take Note: These Analysts Believe Gold Will Go to $5,000 – or More!
  2. What’s the Difference Between 1 Gold Karat, 1 Diamond Carat and 1 Troy Ounce?

Editor’s Note:

  1. The above article consists of reformatted edited excerpts from the original for the sake of brevity, clarity and to ensure a fast and easy read. The author’s views and conclusions are unaltered.
  2. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given as per paragraph 2 above.
  3. Sign up to receive every article posted via Twitter, Facebook, RSS Feed or our FREE Weekly Newsletter.


One comment

  1. Editor,
    While the author doesn’t speak to it, I suggest you recognize that physical gold is unlikely to be a perfectly linear protector of purchasing power because at any given point in time the physical gold price may be volatile as it responds to time-specific world ‘economic-related’ events.

    All that said, I again urge you to reflect on what I see as an important difference between holding physical gold on one hand, and gold exploration and production company shares on the other.

    I am content to say with respect to physical gold that I don’t worry about the day/day or month/month price. However, that is absolutely not the case when I think about gold company shares. The price of both gold exploration and gold production company shares is highly dependent at any given point in time – and over time – on the U.S.$ denominated price of physical gold. That is because the current physical gold price (subject of course to ‘in-place’ hedging contracts) dictates the current and prospective revenue stream of those companies. I have noticed that most commentators do not clearly make this distinction.
    Ian Campbell