10 Myths That Suggest Gold Supposedly Has a Bright Future (+2K Views)

The bulls are bullish on gold for all the wrong reasons, and the price action is supporting my position. In my opinion, gold is being supported by pillars of sand – 19 in total – and the tide is coming in.

So writes Robert Wagner in edited excerpts from his original article* as posted on SeekingAlpha.com under the title Why I Don’t Own Gold.

[The following article is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.munKNEE.com and may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.]

Below are just 10 of the 19 myths (i. e. pillars of sand) regarding gold and why it, supposedly, has a bright future:

Pillar #1: Printing money causes inflation

That is the #1 myth perpetuated by the gold bulls. Even after many years of money printing…and not experiencing inflation, the diehards still cling to this outdated monetary theory. There simply is no truth to it, and the very fact that every market measure of inflation proves that should be enough to put that theory to bed.

Yes, printing money can cause inflation under the right conditions, but printing money during a financial crisis to prevent a banking collapse and to avoid a deflationary spiral aren’t the right conditions. Baring a supply shock of an economically critical commodity like oil, it is highly unlikely inflation will take root until there is a tight labor market and excessive spending. We are a long, long, long way away from those economic conditions.

Pillar #2: The U.S. dollar is going to collapse and go to zero

…The U.S. dollar going to zero…isn’t a legitimate economic theory. Gold is more likely to “go to the moon” than the U.S. dollar going to zero, but neither are going to happen in our lifetime.

Pillar #3: The debt will force the U.S. government to print money

The debt, and printing money, have absolutely no relationship what so ever. The debt is the result of Congress spending money, printing money is the result of the Federal Reserve implementing monetary policy. Our Federal Reserve System was designed in a manner to specifically prevent Congress from dictating monetary policy. The Federal Reserve is an independent body deliberately shielded from political influence…

Pillar #4: Gold is better than paper money

…The world abandoned the gold standard for very, very good reasons. A gold standard is an inelastic currency that requires fixed exchange rates to function, neither of which are good for a modern economy. A fiat currency is highly elastic and functions with floating exchange rates, both of which are critical for modern economies to function. Had we been under a ridged gold standard in 2008, it is highly likely we would have had a catastrophic global banking system collapse, and the world would be deep in depression.

Pillar #5: Central banks, India and China buying gold will drive gold higher

No it won’t and no it didn’t, if anything inventories of gold that are now becoming financial liabilities are likely to be sold on the market as gold continues to fall. Inventories of gold during a bear market simply represent more future selling. Central banks that rely on gold to manage their monetary policy will be forced to sell their gold or risk inflation. Central banks that bought gold at its peak injected $1,902 new dollars per ounce into their economy, now that same ounce can only bring $1,300 or so back out of the economy. If gold continues to fall, central banks can lose control of their monetary system and have difficulty containing inflation…

Pillar #6: Printing money is inflationary, gold is not

That is partially true but misses the point. Under a gold standard the value of a currency is fixed, and the economy adjusts to the relatively fixed supply of currency. Basically under a gold standard the tail wags the dog, and is why the U.S. experienced such vicious business cycles in the pre-Fed era of the mid to late 1900s. Where there are ample supplies coming to market, the economy experiences deflation, where there are shortages, there is inflation, and there are almost constant bank runs and financial panics. Sure the average price under a gold standard may be zero inflation, but the price volatility is extreme. One year of 25% inflation may be followed by 20% deflation for a 0% compounded rate of inflation over those two years, but that is a rough way to get 0% inflation. A gold standard simply isn’t a superior system for a modern economy, and therefore the gold demand based upon its currency value is unjustified.

Pillar #7: Black swan events are no longer supportive of gold

Gold is no longer acting as a safe haven investment. Unlike the past, people are using crisis as an opportunity to sell their gold not buy it. Panics are being used as opportunities to exit, not accumulate gold.

Pillar #8: Gold always holds its value, in “Roman times and ounce of gold bought a nice suit, and today an ounce of gold buys a nice suit.”

It that were true, it would imply that:

1. there have been no efficiencies built into making a good suit since Roman times. While I can’t prove this, I’m pretty sure the man-hours needed to produce a good suit, or toga, in Roman times is astronomically higher than it is today, so if a suit costs the same in Roman times as it does today, it proves gold has lost an huge amount of value since Roman times, and is therefore an inflationary currency like the U.S. dollar.
2. a good suit would cost the exact same every single year an economy under a gold standard because the price of an ounce of gold is fixed implying once again inflation in the suit market and the costs of production fall but the price doesn’t.
3. a good suit went for $50 in 1974, $800 in 1979, $250 in 2002, $1,900 in 2011 and $1,300 today. Clearly there is something missing in this Roman suit theory of gold’s value.

Pillar #9: The end is near, the old world order is going to collapse, paper will be worthless

I call these theories the Armageddon theories of gold, and they represent the extreme tail risk of the lowest probability. Sure a global melt-down is possible, but highly improbable, and if we do experience a global melt-down, I would invest is lead, gun powder, guns and seeds before I invested in gold. I’m pretty sure that if a man meets another man in post-Apocalypse world, and the one man has a loaded gun and the other man has gold, the man with the loaded gun will walk away with the gun and gold but with one less bullet.

Pillar #10: Gold is the investment for every economic condition

Not so and investors are now discovering that as those that bought gold in 1979 also learned. In reality the inelastic nature of gold makes it ideal for occasional bubbles, one of which looks to have just popped back in 2011.

Gold does well during periods of inflation when used as a hedge. Recently gold has done well not because of inflation, but because of the fear of inflation. The realization that that fear is unfounded is slowly sinking into the markets, and is why gold is falling in price.

Gold can also do well during periods of deflation as long as interest rates provide a negative real return. Until recently treasury bonds were providing a negative real return, meaning that people that bought them were basically being guaranteed a loss on them. In that situation gold provided a better alternative than a sure loss. Today, however, interest rates are headed higher, and higher interest rates act like kryptonite to gold prices, and people will substitute higher yielding assets for their gold. Gold does well when there are no viable substitutes, that condition no longer exists…

[An additional 9 pillars of sand for gold can be found in the original article*.]

Conclusion

…Hype, fear and outdated monetary theories simply aren’t enough to support the price of gold. Every finance and economics text book teaches that gold is basically an inflation hedge, and without inflation gold is simply a useless piece of yellow metal. Either the gold bugs are right or the Fed is right, and my money is on the Fed.

[Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.]

*http://seekingalpha.com/article/1526792-why-i-don-t-own-gold (© 2013 Seeking Alpha)

Related Articles:

1. The Bears & Bulls Debate “What’s Next For Gold?”