90% of the management teams you interview will be unable to present a reasoned argument for pursuing their project and to justify the approach they are using so let’s examine Rick Rule’s 11 “must ask” questions, one by one.
So writes Henry Bonner (sprottglobal.com) in edited excerpts from a conversation he had recently with Sprott Asset Management USA Chairman Rick Rule as posted in an article under the title Does Your Junior Have Competent Management? – Rick Rule.
[The following article is presented by Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.munKNEE.com and the FREE Market Intelligence Report newsletter (sample here) and may have been edited ([ ]), abridged (…) and/or reformatted (some sub-titles and bold/italics emphases) for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. This paragraph must be included in any article re-posting to avoid copyright infringement.]
Bonner goes on to outline Rule’s most essential insights into investing in natural resources in further edited (and paraphrased in some instances) excerpts:
“Exploration is a knowledge business and only a small number of sector participants generate the overwhelming majority of the industry’s economic success – two realizations that are key to improving your chances of success.
In order to pick the winners, you must have the ability to view the entire field as a spectrum. Each management team will fall somewhere on the spectrum – most around the average – but those on the higher end of the bell curve become exponentially more valuable. As such, investors should seek to determine the quality of the management team independently of the value of the current project they are undertaking.
The key for investors is to evaluate management teams based on their past performances in similar situations, to beware of teams whose past successes were in areas different from where their current project is located. Past success in the relevant field is an invaluable tool to filter out the truly productive industry participants especially since…more than half of the management teams you interview will not be able to point to a history of success relative to the task at hand.
Making money and adding value in mineral exploration is a function of answering a series of unanswered questions. Management must have first established sufficient credibility that we care about their answers. They must identify and defend their thesis based on the evidence at hand.
90% of the management teams you interview will be unable to present a reasoned argument for pursuing their project and to justify the approach they are using so let’s examine the questions one by one.
- Is the process by which an exploration team proposes to pursue their target valid or optimal?
- Does it, in fact, address the most essential questions that will determine whether the project is a success?
- Does the management team possess the requisite skill sets to conduct the process and efficiently answer these questions?
- Does the management have a reasonable estimate as to how much time will be required to answer these questions?
- How was the estimate established?
- Does the management know how much money will be required to answer these questions?
- How much will it cost to run the company during that time?
- If there are capital shortfalls, how, when, and from whom will the shortfall be addressed?
- How would the management quickly ascertain that the project was unsuccessful – meaning that the target is not of sufficient value to justify further exploration? (This is a very inconvenient situation for management, which may result in a reduction in their equity and options values. They may construe disappointing exploration results as threatening to their salaries. In most exploration projects, we expect that exploration will be unsuccessful at establishing a resource, but the ramifications of this outcome are rarely discussed be management.)
- What valuation range will we have if exploration does result in the discovery of a resource? (Too often, exploration teams pursue targets where even ‘success’ will produce a paltry reward relative to the risks. Small mines have as many problems as big mines, but they cannot make you big money.)
- Finally, is management’s estimate of the potential economic value of a project well-reasoned?”
Rule believes the above questions are essential to ascertaining with confidence that a mining company’s management team is competent, knowledgeable, and will efficiently deploy their shareholder capital.
[Editor’s Note: The author’s views and conclusions in the above article are unaltered and no personal comments have been included to maintain the integrity of the original post. Furthermore, the views, conclusions and any recommendations offered in this article are not to be construed as an endorsement of such by the editor.]
*http://sprottgroup.com/thoughts/articles/does-your-junior-have-competent-management-rick-rule/ (© Sprott Inc.; Subscribe to our complimentary publications Sprott’s Thoughts and Markets at a Glance)
Related Articles:
1. The Five “M’s” for Picking Gold Mining Stocks
With gold miners, in general, so attractively valued relative to the gold bullion price, the question becomes which stocks are the most compelling and have the best leverage to robust precious metals prices…In order to find the diamonds in the rough, I use what I call “The Five M’s” for mining stocks… Market cap, Management, Money, Minerals and Mine life cycle. [Let me explain each .] Words: 1146
2. Country Risk Ratings Ranked 1 – 47
Precious metal miners operate in a large variety of countries and our interest in these mining companies on the one hand and country risk exposure on the other led us to compile a comprehensive list of jurisdictions of concern to precious metal investors….[numbering 47 in total. All 47 countries are ranked below]. Read More »
3. 8 Criteria For Choosing a Top-Notch Gold Mining Company
When gold goes up again, I believe we’ll find that the junior miners that have been crushed into the dust will be tomorrow’s value plays. Your goal, then, is to identify these “diamonds in the dustbin” today. Below are 8 ways I’m finding tomorrow’s gold value plays today. Read More »
4. 9 Things to Look for When Choosing a Junior Mining Company to Invest In
In mining exploration, an “anomaly” is a geological formation that might attract a prospector’s interest. However, one rule of thumb is that you have to look at 1,000 anomalies to find one prospect and fewer than one prospect in a thousand turns into a mine. In other words, finding a mine is a million-to-one shot and that is one reason why junior mining stocks are highly speculative. Another reason is that it’s much easier to launch and promote one of these stocks than it is to build a profitable business. So junior mines attract more than their share of unscrupulous operators and stock promoters. Words: 504
5. Jeff Nielson: What to Look for When Considering Which Gold Mining Companies to Buy
While investing in gold mining companies is not quite as simple as novices to this sector might at first conclude, neither is it so overwhelmingly complicated as to make these companies inaccessible to individual, retail investors. Below are a number of things to look for when considering an investment in such companies. Words: 2745
6. Jeff Nielson: More of What to Look for When Investing in the Gold Miner Sector
With gold recently trading at its nominal high it is only natural that investor curiosity about precious metals mining companies should start to grow and the fact that relatively few investors know much about the various types of companies in this market sector is an indication that this market is many years away from peaking. [This article will change all that.] Words: 1912
7. Gold & Silver Miners: What’s the Best Time to Invest in the Producers – and in the Juniors?
While juniors, mid-tiers and large producers will usually bottom around the same time, they each outperform at different times. In this missive we look at some charts to decipher when its time to buy [each category and when one or the other] should be avoided. Words: 470
8. Country Risk: ALWAYS Discount the Value of Companies Operating in Risky Jurisdictions – Here’s Why
There is enough risk in investing without the added risk of political instability so why does the investment community often use the same metrics to value the shares of exploration and production of resources companies regardless of their location in the world? This is so very wrong, yet it continues. Frankly, when investing in the stock market you should ALWAYS discount the value of the stock that you are considering buying if the jurisdiction is not historically safe, stable, and economically strong. [Let me explain further.] Words: 746
9. Focus on Quality Junior Gold & Silver Companies to Maximize Returns – Here’s Why & How
The outlook for many junior resource companies in 2013 is grim so investors should focus on those who own quality undeveloped gold and silver deposits in safe stable countries. Such companies offer exceptional value in that they provide the best exposure to a rising precious metals price environment – and the assets the world’s mining companies desperately need. [Let me explain.] Words: 1328; Charts: 15 Read More »
10. Why Invest in Junior Miners?
Leverage is the simple answer. It is not uncommon for junior mining companies to experience huge gains (10x or more) very quickly as news of a discovery is made known to the public. Words: 893