munKNEE.com Your Key to Making Money
When holding their stock picks for the year, banks were only 43% accurate with their predictions. 
That’s right! Flipping a coin would have been potentially more effective than buying bank stock picks, which ended up down -4.79% on the year. The S&P 500 finished down only -0.69%. Simply just making any interest in a savings account would have been more effective as well. [This article ranks] the banks, from best to worst, based on accuracy of their calls and also based on the performance of their recommendations.
The comments above and below are excerpts from an article by Jeff Desjardins (VisualCapitalist.com) which may have been enhanced – edited ([ ]) and abridged (…) – by munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!)
to provide you with a faster & easier read.
Register to receive our bi-weekly Market Intelligence Report newsletter (see sample here , sign up in top right hand corner). It’s free, so sign up for it, try it out and if you don’t like it, unsubscribe. It’s that easy.
Let’s say that a bank such as Goldman Sachs publishes a recommendation to “Buy Stock X”. It’s hard to ignore a bet by a powerful investment bank such as Goldman. We are mere mortals in the pecking order, and they are supposed to be the all-knowing smart money from Wall Street. Do we buy the stock, or is it simply wiser to pass?
Bank Performance Overall
The folks at InterTrader have done considerable legwork to dive deep into the data on investment bank recommendations made in 2015. They looked at every bet made by the 16 top banks throughout the year to assess both potential returns and accuracy. The results are pretty underwhelming.
If you bought every stock recommended and held until the end of the year, here’s what your performance would look like:
Overall, when holding their stock recommendations for the year, banks were only 43% accurate with their predictions. That’s right – flipping a coin would have been potentially more effective than buying bank stock recommendations, which ended up down -4.79% on the year. The S&P 500 finished down only -0.69%, but simply just making any interest in a savings account would have been more effective as well.
A Closer Look at Individual Banks
While banks as a whole struggled with picks in 2015, it’s also important to look at banks on a more micro level to see how they performed. Here’s a look at the recommendations by Deutsche Bank, and how they did:
Deutsche Bank nailed 41% of their predictions, and had a -8.93% return if picks were held throughout the year.
As you can see, some of their picks such as Microsoft and Wix.com gained double digits. On the other hand, recommendations such as Whiting Petroleum got absolutely crushed throughout the year, dropping -70.1%. Overall, Deutsche Bank’s performance here definitely didn’t do much to help the struggling company get out of its rut.
Which Banks Were Most Accurate?
Here are the banks, from best to worst, based on accuracy of their calls:
Nomura, Credit Suisse, BAML, and Barclays all batted above .500 if stocks were held throughout the year, while 10 banks all did worse than a coin flip. Citigroup had an off year, only nailing 14% of its picks.
Which Banks Had the Best Returns?
Here are the banks, from best to worst, based on the performance of these recommendations:
Just two banks, Credit Suisse and Nomura, had positive returns if stocks were held through the year. Meanwhile, Canaccord Genuity’s picks were knocked down -16% over the course of 2015.
An Important Caveat
Throughout the above article, we are showing the results if stock picks were held from when they were made until the end of the year. However, it is worth noting that the investment banks actually did slightly better if picks were held for shorter durations of time:
| Time | Accuracy | Gains % |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 55% | 0.80% |
| 90 Days | 49% | -1.48% |
| 180 Days | 42% | -3.66% |
| End of Year | 43% | -4.79% |
In other words – if you sold all stock recommendations exactly 30 days after buying, you would have actually made a 0.8% return throughout the year. This is still a lower return than a savings account, but it is an improvement on losing -4.79%!
For a more in-depth dive into the data, we highly recommend checking out InterTrader’s interactive version of the results.
What do you think about the above article? Have your say in the Comment Section below.
- “Like” this article on Facebook
- Have your say on Twitter
- Register to receive our free tri-weekly Market Intelligence Report newsletter (see sample here , sign up in top right hand corner).
- Every day, 7 days a week, I scan hundreds of financial articles, identify the best, and then repost abbreviated versions of them on munKNEE.com.
- I have been doing so for 9 years now and have posted 4,500 articles to date (see archives on Gold & Silver, Investing, Economic & Financial matters and some interesting Miscellaneous articles.)
- The newsletter is free so, what the hell, sign up for it in top right hand corner, try it out and, if you don’t like it, unsubscribe. It’s that easy.