Who Won the Presidential Debate, Both or Neither? But then, What Difference Does It Really Make?

Who won the debate? Well, if you rely on the media (the CNN poll had Obama winning by 48 to 40 and Fox News probably had Romney winning by the very same number), the commentary was just as I expected, biased, based on one’s ideological point of view. There was nary an objective assessment among the lot! Media types no longer seem constrained or embarrassed  about their heavily opinionated comments which are, for the most part, nothing less than shills and advocates for their respective candidates and/or parties. Words: 378

So says Arnold Bock in an opinion piece sent in to www.munKNEE.com for posting consideration.

The above is one of the reasons I don’t have much interest in partisan politics, the debates, policy statements or virtually anything associated with the game.  Everything is strategized, focus group tested, practiced all with the purpose of maligning the other side or giving the listener what they ostensibly want.

Don’t Delay!
Go here to receive Your Daily Intelligence Report with links to the latest articles posted on munKNEE.com
– It’s FREE and includes an “easy unsubscribe feature” should you decide to do so at any time
– Join the informed! 100,000+ articles are read every month at munKNEE.com
All articles are posted in edited form for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read
– Get newly posted articles delivered automatically to your inbox
– Sign up here

I find the whole process nothing more that a sporting event with the mindless partisans/fans idolizing their side and demonizing the other.

Where are the objective analyses based on facts?  Where is the gentlemanly respect in the process of discussion and debate?

All that said, it struck me that both Obama and Romney did about as well as each could.  Who won?  Objectively, it was probably Romney in the sense that he could articulate and present numbers better.  As for Obama, he did much better than last time.


Both won and both lost in that perceptions of winning and losing are much more important among viewers and swing voters than objective reality.  Since most people have their minds already predisposed to a certain person or direction, their guy won.  As for the media, they are little more than advocates for one or the other.  Or course their guy won.

As an aside, the only way to reform the system in order to improve it is to place a box on each ballot which allows the voter to check off “None of the Above”  Then those ticks must be counted and published along with the popular vote count of the various candidates. That would show our current democratic process for the fraud that it is….

Who won?  Both and Neither.  Frankly, though, who really cares and does it really make any real difference to the type of government? I think not.

Related Article:

Choice Is An Illusion: A Vote for Obamney of the Republicrats Ensures National Debt Will Continue to Skyrocket & the Economy Will Crash


When you head out to the voting booth this November, know this… whether you pick Obama or Romney, you’re essentially voting for the same person. If you watch this video  all the way to the end (it gets better as it progresses) you will understand why this is so, why that come election time you’ll only have one choice – Obamney of the Republicrats party. The arguments, the debates, the smear campaigns and the emphasized differences between the two candidates are there to give you an illusion of choice.

One comment

  1. I agree and disagree. For as long as things run ok, we can afford this attitude of “leave me alone”…but when things go really wrong, as they are at the moment, we need to be engaged and involved. There are many ways to do it, think of the consequences.