…Gold and gold stocks have quietly put on a show since the beginning of 2016 but a quick screen of gold stocks shows a half-dozen currently valued at less than their book value. For some miners, this anemic valuation relative to book makes total sense, while for 2 companies it could represent an intriguing buying opportunity as it may signal an undervaluation of current assets and production potential. Frankly, a little shine is all these gold miners need to be great once again.
This version of the original article by Sean Williams has been edited ([ ]) and revised (…) to ensure a faster & easier read. It may be re-posted as long as it includes a hyperlink back to this revised version to avoid copyright infringement.
Bringing gold miners’ book value into focus
Take Eldorado Gold (NYSE:EGO) as a perfect example of a company trading well below book value that deserves plenty of investor skepticism. On paper, Eldorado Gold should be a superstar. This up-and-coming miner with assets throughout Turkey and Greece is expected to dazzle Wall Street with its Skouries mine. Located in Greece, Skouries has a projected 25-year life span, to go along with 3 million ounces of gold and 1.5 billion pounds of copper.
Unfortunately, Eldorado Gold’s Greek properties are also a source of frustration. Arbitration between Greek regulators and the company over environmental concerns has held up progress at Skouries and the Olympias mine in Greece, causing Eldorado to threaten an investment freeze on these assets for the time being. In other words, weakness in Eldorado’s valuation is very much warranted at this point given the ongoing uncertainty surrounding its Greek assets and intermediate-term production.
However, two miners with price-to-book values below 1 could make for quite the steal.
1. Yamana Gold
Arguably the greatest below-book steal of all gold stocks could be mid-cap Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY). Yamana Gold has been weighed down for the past five years by its higher debt levels and hefty capital expenditures. Over the past five quarters, the company has missed Wall Street’s earnings-per-share consensus each time, and lately it’s been only nominally profitable for most quarters. However, that could soon change.
The reason Yamana’s capital expenditures have been so high, and why its costs haven’t been the lowest in the industry, is because it’s developing three new sources of production that are set to come on line in 2018 or 2019. The Cerro Moro and C1 Santa Luz mines are by far the most exciting. Cerro Moro remained on track and budget as of the company’s second-quarter update, and it’s expected to yield an average of 150,000 ounces of gold and 7.2 million ounces of silver over its first three years. Meanwhile, C1 Santa Luz is being re-commissioned with the expectation of an average of 114,000 ounces of gold annually for up to a 10-year life span. Both Cerro Moro and Santa Luz should commence production in 2018.
The third development will merely be icing on the cake. The Suruca development within its already successful Chapada property should add between 45,000 ounces of gold and 60,000 ounces of gold annually once it begins commercial production in 2019. Suruca should be able to produce this average for about five years.
If we add these three mines, plus assume a low to mid-single-digit organic expansion to existing mines, Yamana could be looking at a boost in gold equivalent annual production of 35% to 40% by the end of the decade. That’s huge, because as Yamana’s production and sales increase, it’s expected all-in sustaining costs (AISC) should fall.
So, we have a company that should have a below-industry average AISC, improving margins, and an expected major jump in cash flow and profitability, all within the next two years, yet it is currently valued at just 55% of book value. I’d call that a screaming value.
The other intriguing option in the gold industry is Goldcorp (NYSE:GG), a large-cap producer of gold and other precious metals and byproducts. Goldcorp’s weakness over the past five years has mainly been a result of gold and silver prices falling from their 2011 highs but, like Yamana, Goldcorp has a lot to offer long-term investors.
- To begin with, as a larger mining company, Goldcorp is all about efficiency. It has two levers it regularly pulls in order to boost margins. First, as noted, Goldcorp relies on byproducts in its mines (lead, zinc, copper, and even silver) to help lower its costs to mine gold. In its most recent quarter, Goldcorp produced over 84 million pounds of zinc, 26 million pounds of lead, 7.9 million pounds of copper, and 7.4 million ounces of silver. Being able to sell these metals alongside its gold production regularly pushes its AISC well below that of its peers.
- Second, the company has internal controls it can use to lower costs. Aside from tinkering with its capital expenditure budget, it’s been working to lower costs within its existing mines. It set out to eliminate $250 million in annual costs, and will recognize about $200 million in annual savings this year. Management has commented that its initial $250 million will be achieved, and it actually may need to raise the bar because it expects to save even more annually.
In terms of production, continued ramp-up and its Eleonore and Cerro Negro mines should allow Goldcorp an opportunity to expand its gold equivalent output by perhaps 20% by 2022. In the meantime, its efficiency standards might push its already low AISC (an expected $825 an ounce in 2017) up to 20% lower by 2022. Despite this, and the expectation of a better than doubling in EPS between 2016 and 2020, Goldcorp is valued at just 82% of book value. That could represent an intriguing opportunity for investors.
Related Articles from the munKNEE Vault:
I think Barrick Gold is one gold mining company that should outperform all the others in the months ahead. This article looks at the company’s most recent earnings report and what this report indicates for investors considering sprinkling a little gold into a portfolio in need of a little sparkle.
Today we have identified three Canadian gold miners with the highest operating margin geometric growth over five years. The market capitalizations of the stocks on our list range from $374.2 million to $26.1 billion.
Today we have identified 5 Canadian gold mining stocks—not only small caps—that have the lowest extraction costs (or cash costs) in the mining industry and, as such, will likely benefit most from a rising gold price environment.
I snagged a chart off my Bloomberg terminal…that shows what I think could be a golden opportunity in one of the world’s biggest gold miners: Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX).
The 5 gold mining companies on our list beat the industry average EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) margin of 28%.
By investing in companies with the leanest operations investors have the best protection in the industry against declining prices, but also benefit from the rising bullion price. This article highlights 5 TSX gold mining companies that have the lowest All-in Sustaining Costs per troy ounce of gold mined and the highest operating margins.
Today’s article features ONE gold producer, our top gold stock pick, that we think is most likely to outperform its industry peers out of our Gold Investing Pro universe of gold stocks.
Today we have identified five profitable small cap gold stocks with big upside potential, as they are trading at a significant discount to Net Asset Value (NAV).
Investing in small cap mining companies can be a risky game. The process of finding and extracting gold takes years, which leaves plenty of room for error, so why not buy a company that has an established cash flow?
One of Benjamin Graham’s investment strategies was to purchase shares in companies trading at less than net current asset value, also commonly referred to as working capital. The theory behind such an approach is that you are purchasing the company’s most liquid assets at a discount, so if you were to buy the company and liquidate its assets, you would make a profit.
Investing in companies with strong balance sheets is sound investment policy. They carry far less risk because defaulting on any obligations is out of the question for them. Furthermore, the less debt a company has, the more room they have to raise debt in the future, which can be beneficial to current shareholders as it is a non-dilutive financing option. The 4 Canadian gold juniors on our list have current ratios over 2 and carry no debt.
The CAPE (cash adjusted PE) ratio shows what investors are really paying for a company’s earnings. It is calculated as price – net cash per share/earnings per share. Today we have identified 3 Canadian junior gold mining stocks trading below the industry median CAPE ratio of 28x.
The following 5 Canadian junior gold companies have operating margins over 19% which gives an investor good protection against a falling gold price.
In the early part of the 1980s, there were many seminal gold price studies that showed 5% to 10% of an investment portfolio could have been optimally allocated to gold from 1968 to 1980 to maximize a risk return allocation based on performance. Even today many high profile and alternative financial experts…say a 10% gold allocation makes sense but a closer look at the facts show that they may be a little understated in percentage terms. Let’s take a closer look as to why this may be the case.
I still find it curious that many investors don’t realize what a significant role royalty and streaming companies play in the mining business…Here are the top six things I believe investors should know about this specialized sector.
munKNEE should be in everybody’s inbox and MONEY in everybody’s wallet!
If you want more articles like the one above sign up in the top right hand corner of this page and receive our FREE bi-weekly newsletter (see sample here).